2017 Jaguar F-Pace S

2017 Jaguar F-Pace S

The Good:
– Sharp styling inside and out
– Cabin tech and features
– Reasonably smooth ride
The Bad:
– Pricey with options
– Some ergonomics issues
– No low-range gearing

There was a time when Jaguar built only cars and Land Rover built only 4x4s. And then Land Rover started dipping their feet in the soft-roading crossover market. That slippery slope has now led to Jaguar’s first SUV. While we weren’t initially fans of that idea, the final product turned out to be rather attractive.

The Jaguar F-Pace is based on the all-new aluminium platform that the latest Jaguar sedans are based on, and completely unrelated to the Range Rover Evoque which is still riding on the ancient Land Rover LR2 platform. Decidedly compact, the oddly-named F-Pace translates Jaguar’s current design language rather beautifully into an SUV. It is a swoopy design complemented by the optional 22-inch alloys as seen on our F-Pace S tester. It’s probably the only vehicle we like the looks of, among compact luxury crossovers.

Step-in height is fine without side-steps, and once inside, you are greeted with a cabin reminiscent of its platform-mate, the XF, but the newer F-Pace features a bit nicer design and technology. The dash, armrests and centre-console sides are leather-lined, there are even fewer buttons as the touchscreen is wider, and there is blue mood-lighting emanating from the door panels. A few metallic bits and pieces round off the cleanly-styled interior. But while some trim materials are truly premium, the door inserts are overly firm and the lower panels are hard plastics.

Cabin space is about adequate both front and rear, although a middle-rear passenger will have to spread his legs to accommodate the protruding rear a/c console. As an option, the rear seatbacks can recline slightly or fold flat electrically, although the slow motors takes ages to do so. Under the swoopy power-operated tailgate, the decent-sized boot is fine for daily activities and carrying prams, but volume is still cut down by the full-size spare wheel underneath raising up the floor height. Covered cup-holders, pockets and storage cubbies are plentiful, including a shelf underneath the gear-shifter console. But in an odd move, the UAE-regulation fire-extinguisher is stuffed inside the glovebox, effectively making the latter useless.

Jaguar’s cabin tech finally gets an upgrade, with a new wider 10.2-inch multi-touch capacitive touchscreen featuring a nicer interface and SSD-stored 3D navigation, useable like a smartphone. Other features include a strong stereo with Bluetooth support and 2 USB ports, a panoramic glass roof, a good a/c with rear controls and vents, a full-LCD gauge cluster, heads-up display, front and rear LED lighting with adaptive headlights, smart keyless entry and start, and a “leisure activity key” which is a waterproof wristband that can be used as an alternative key when you go to the beach and leave your actual key (and clothes) inside the car.

Powered by Jaguar’s usual 3.0-litre supercharged V6, in the F-Pace S this motor makes 375 hp at 6500 rpm and 450 Nm of torque from 3300 to 4500 rpm, fed to all four wheels. It’s the same engine that does duty in the wild F-Type S, but here it feels and sounds a whole lot subdued, with an uninspiring exhaust note. It still offers a decent bit of initial kick in this nearly 2-ton crossover, followed by a gradual build-up of power rather than a deluge of acceleration, as it did the 0-100 kph run in a reasonably-quick 6.3 seconds during our desert-winter afternoon test.

Fuel consumption came in at a decent 14 litres/100 km for us, although it’ll likely do better with a bit more casual driving. With a smooth-shifting 8-speed automatic on call, there are enough overdrive gears to aid in economy. There are also responsive paddle-shifters should you wish to play with gears manually.

On the highway, the F-Pace rides fairly well on Dubai roads, even with the fancy 22-inch alloys, with jitters becoming evident only on broken pavement or sizeable imperfections. However, while it’s fairly quiet under 100 kph, wind and road noises reach moderate levels at higher speeds. It’s definitely not among the quietest of luxury cars.

The F-Pace is being branded the sports car of crossovers, but it’s not quite there. The S version comes with the optional adaptive suspension as standard. The handling is great, with high grip limits from the 265/40 tyres and neutral cornering behaviour, but the mild body roll makes it feel slightly less-planted than, say, BMW’s X3 around tighter curves. Also, while the steering is weighted nicely, albeit slightly on the firm side, feedback is minimal. The brakes are also good, with decent pedal feel too, but it’s not neck-snapping stopping power by any means. The F-Pace S can be driven fast, but not sports-car fast like some of its rivals.

Interestingly, the F-Pace has pretty good ground clearance, so a bit of mild offroading is theoretically possible. There’s no low-range gearing though, while the low-profile tyres will make it tougher, but at least it clears tall curbs in parking lots. It matches the Range Rover Sport’s ground clearance at standard height.

Make no mistake, the compact F-Pace is a very desirable entry in this rather dull segment. Its main problem though, is its sky-high price when loaded up with the right options, especially in S trim. That’s nudging into midsize Porsche Cayenne territory. There’s a new turbo-4 base model on the way which might be a more enticing proposition for typical crossover buyers.

Price Range:
Dh 295,000-369,000

Current Model Introduced in:

Body Styles:
5-door wagon

3.0L 375 hp V6 s’charged / 450 Nm

8-speed automatic


Front: independent
Rear: independent

Front: discs
Rear: discs

Curb Weight:
1861 kg

4730 mm

2874 mm

Top Speed:
250 kph(limited)

Test Acceleration 0-100 kph:
6.3 sec.

Observed Test Fuel Economy:
14.0 litres/100km

What do you think?



  1. A Big Fat Cat 🙂

  2. A decent spec Cayenne S, from one segment above, is a much better and a valuable option. Dont see any reason why anyone should buy this for 300K+. Interior plastic quality is sub par. Engine is showing its age and is not efficient either.

  3. Hi drive arabia,

    A friendly comment, Maybe you need to reconsider the goods and bads when write a review, cars like X5 or Q7 or this one is made to be a superfast SUV so I don’t think that it is wise to mention that there is no low range gear! Bads should be considering the segment and usage.

    Just a point of view to take or ignore.

    • Author

      The Range Rover Sport is faster and has low-range gearing. The SVR was the fastest SUV on the ‘Ring for a while. Even the first-generation Cayenne had low-range.

  4. Well to be really honest the writer is very correct that the price is sky-high & goes into Porsche Cayenne territory. Looks good though… !!!

  5. Very well written review, descriptive and smart. I’ve got my eye on the fpace but will likely wait for the next iteration.

  6. still a big fat cat compared to the X3, Q5 and Macan.

  7. You can’t compare to German cars in any way as this car is pure elegance and classy with a bit of sport. I have been driving and still do BMW’s since 10 years and had enough sportiness, reaching mid-40’s I think this is my next change into the next classy level with some style!
    I only hope prices drop and love to know more about the 4 cylinders spects and the expected price. Any ideas?

Browse archives

Share This