2020 Land Rover Range Rover Vogue
| The Good: – Stylish inside and out – Cabin trim and features – Power, stability and comfort |
The Bad: – Very expensive as options add up – Distracting centre-console screens – Odd delay in throttle response |
Land Rover
2017 Land Rover Discovery
| The Good: – Cabin trim and features – Great ride, safe handling – Potentially great offroader |
The Bad: – On the expensive side – Some hard cabin plastics – Looks as soft as a softroader |
2016 Land Rover Discovery Sport
| The Good: – Clean styling inside and out – Fair cabin trim and features – Decent comfort and handling |
The Bad: – Pricey with options – Not particularly quick – No low-range gearing |
2016 Land Rover LR4
| The Good: – Cabin layout and features – Off-road capabilities – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – High base price – Safe but floaty handling – Could be quicker |
2016 Land Rover Range Rover SV Autobiography
| The Good: – Stylish inside and out – Cabin space and features – Power, ride and handling |
The Bad: – Very, very expensive – Outdated multimedia screens – Side-steps are not standard |
2016 Land Rover Range Rover Sport SVR
| The Good: – Fast on straights and corners – Class-leading cabin styling – Offroad capability retained |
The Bad: – Quite expensive – Harsh ride on some surfaces – Potentially high fuel bills |
2015 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
| The Good: – Great styling inside and out – Handles pretty good – Decent ride comfort |
The Bad: – Expensive for its class – Small boot volume – No low-range gearing |
2014 Land Rover Range Rover Sport Supercharged
| The Good: – Fast on straights and corners – Class-leading cabin styling – Comfortable on and offroad |
The Bad: – Very expensive – Not as distinctive as before – Potentially high fuel bills |
2013 Land Rover Range Rover Evoque Coupe
| The Good: – Least expensive Range Rover – Cabin space and features – Smooth-enough ride |
The Bad: – Most expensive crossover – Rear access and boot space – Some hard cabin plastics |
2010 Land Rover Range Rover Supercharged
| The Good: – Immense road presence – Cabin trim and features – Very very powerful |
The Bad: – Pricey with options – Not as spacious as it looks – Maybe too powerful |
Recent Comments
- on 2026 Cadillac Escalade IQ and Cadillac Escalade IQL launched in the Middle East
- on 2026 Cadillac Escalade IQ and Cadillac Escalade IQL launched in the Middle East
- on 2026 Cadillac Escalade IQ and Cadillac Escalade IQL launched in the Middle East
- on 2027 INFINITI QX65 makes global debut with sporty fastback design
- on 2021 Mercedes-Benz S-Class betters the “world’s best car”
Browse categories
- 212
- Abarth
- Alfa Romeo
- Arcfox
- Aston Martin
- Audi
- Avatr
- BAIC
- Bentley
- BMW
- Borgward
- Brilliance
- Bugatti
- BYD
- Cadillac
- Changan
- Chery
- Chevrolet
- Chrysler
- Citroen
- CMC
- Daihatsu
- DEEPAL
- Dodge
- Dorcen
- Ferrari
- Fiat
- Fisker
- Ford
- Foton
- GAC
- Geely
- Genesis
- GMC
- Great Wall
- Haima
- Haval
- Hawtai
- Honda
- Hongqi
- Hummer
- Hyundai
- iCaur
- Infiniti
- International
- Isuzu
- JAECOO
- Jaguar
- Jeep
- Jetour
- KAIYI
- Kia
- KingLong
- Koenigsegg
- KTM
- Lamborghini
- Land Rover
- Lexus
- Lincoln
- Lotus
- Luxgen
- Mahindra
- Maserati
- Maybach
- Mazda
- McLaren
- Mercedes-Benz
- Mercury
- MG
- Mini
- Mitsubishi
- NIO
- Nissan
- Opel
- Others
- Oullim
- Peugeot
- PGO
- Porsche
- Proton
- Ram
- Renault
- Rolls Royce
- ROX
- Saab
- Seat
- Skoda
- Soueast
- Spyker
- SRT
- Ssangyong
- Subaru
- Suzuki
- Tank
- Tata
- Tesla
- Toyota
- Volkswagen
- Volvo
- Voyah
- ZNA
- Zotye