2009 Chevrolet Traverse
| The Good: – Superb fuel economy – Cabin space and features – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Too long to park easily – Some hard cabin plastics – Barely suited for soft-roading |
| The Good: – Superb fuel economy – Cabin space and features – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Too long to park easily – Some hard cabin plastics – Barely suited for soft-roading |
| The Good: – Amazing handling – Awesome engine – Head-turning looks |
The Bad: – Expensive and seats only four – Rear-seat headroom – Head-turning looks |
| The Good: – Looks better than before – Powerful and efficient engine – Feature-filled spacious cabin |
The Bad: – A bit too long – A bit too expensive – A bit limited in the boot area |
| The Good: – Immense presence – Immense power – Immense cabin |
The Bad: – Immense size – Immense price – Immense fuel consumption |
| The Good: – Spacious interior – Class-leading engine – Excellent fuel economy |
The Bad: – Hard cabin plastics all over – Not enough low-end kick – A bit pricey for its class |
| The Good: – Spacious interior – Good ride quality – Excellent fuel economy |
The Bad: – Not very fast – Average handling – Controls feel too soft |
| The Good: – Excellent handling – Comfortable ride – Upscale cabin design |
The Bad: – Scrawny engine – Average rear legroom – Crappy cup-holders |
| The Good: – Strong enough engine – Decent ride quality – Tons of cargo capacity |
The Bad: – Needs better cabin materials – Awful legroom management – Way too big and hungry |
| The Good: – Sports-car handling – Sports-car acceleration – Sports-car fun |
The Bad: – Hard ride quality – Cramped rear seating – Very expensive |
| The Good: – Immense presence – Immense power – Immense cabin quality |
The Bad: – Immense size – Immense price – Immense fuel consumption |