2002 Honda CR-V
| The Good: – Reliable and solidly built – Roomy interior – Easy to park |
The Bad: – Hard cabin plastics – Needs more power – Not a true offroader |
| The Good: – Reliable and solidly built – Roomy interior – Easy to park |
The Bad: – Hard cabin plastics – Needs more power – Not a true offroader |
| The Good: – Elegant exterior – Classy interior – Immense driving pleasure |
The Bad: – All models are pricey – Brake pedal feel – Some computer issues |
| The Good: – Elegant exterior – Luxurious interior – Some fast engine choices |
The Bad: – All models are too pricey – Expensive to maintain – Isolated driving experience |
| The Good: – Elegant exterior – Luxurious interior – Some fast engine choices |
The Bad: – All models are too pricey – Expensive to maintain – Isolated driving experience |
| The Good: – Built like a tank – Good handling – Available luxury features |
The Bad: – Pricey with options – Lower models are slow – Some hard cabin plastics |
| The Good: – Reliable and solidly built – Roomy interior – Easy to park |
The Bad: – Some cheap cabin plastics – Needs more power – Not a true offroader |
| The Good: – Reliable and solidly built – Low petrol consumption – Nice interior materials |
The Bad: – Not very fast – Top models are pricey – Skinny tyres |
| The Good: – Manageable size – Pleasing looks – Excellent handling |
The Bad: – Basic automatic gearbox – Weak base engines – Might be mistaken for a taxi |
| The Good: – Cheap to maintain – Good luggage space – Japanese reliability |
The Bad: – Dashboard feels cheap – Rear seat not so spacious – Bigger engines not offered here |
| The Good: – Competitive pricing – Large luggage space – Japanese reliability |
The Bad: – Dashboard feels cheap – Rear seat not so spacious – Bigger engines not offered here |