First drive: 2013 Hyundai Tucson 2.4 in the UAE

2012 Hyundai Tucson
This one has been a long time coming, even before the Lamborghini that I test-drove recently. It wasn’t bias; it is just that this cheap crossover is actually quite popular regardless of our review, so much that you might end up counting at least as many of this vehicle as any popular Japanese crossovers on the road. And ‘this’ crossover, which we sourced from a close friend, is none other than the 2013 Hyundai Tucson 2.4, aka “Tuck-Sun”, as it is known to most people, including some of the local dealer’s sales staff.

2012 Hyundai Tucson

The Hyundai Tucson is one of the earliest models in the Hyundai line-up, to receive a makeover based on their “fluidic sculpture” design theme. Styled to look more elegant, with smooth and curvy lines running all over the body, while not reaching the point of being overdone, the Tucson has earned quite a decent reputation for its looks alone. The design charisma continues into the interior even, which is nicely detailed with textured-plastics that cover the entire dash and, upper and lower door sills. The middle bit on all doors, the front center armrest, steering-wheel, and the seats, are all leather-clad in our vehicle, but the rest is hard plastic. Fit and finish seem generally solid.

2012 Hyundai Tucson

Our upper mid-spec car came with several features, including auto headlamps, in-dash audio unit with 6-CD changer and featuring AUX, USB and IPOD support, 6 airbags, ABS with EBD, backlit steering controls for audio system and cruise control, power-adjustable driver’s seat, panoramic roof with operable sunroof for the front passengers and fixed panel for the rear passengers, dual-zone auto air conditioning, smart key with push-start button, rear parking sensors, and two-tone leather interior. The top-spec model comes with a DVD-navigation system, reverse camera with both front and rear sensors, and Bluetooth connectivity with telephone controls on the steering-wheel.

Going by dimensions, the Tucson sits between the sub-compact and compact crossover categories. Nevertheless, there is ample headroom and legroom for both front and rear passengers. The seats are moderately-bolstered, and the front seat-backs are covered in hard plastics. The electric-powered drivers’ seat is infinitely adjustable, and finding the perfect driving position is never a problem. All-round visibility is good, though rear-visibility is somewhat hampered by the swooping roofline. Even without any rear ducts, the air conditioner easily kept up with the typical May weather. The interior is generally quiet, with wind-noise creeping in after 100 kph.

2012 Hyundai Tucson

The Tucson is available in two-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive configurations, with a choice of 2.0-litre and 2.4-litre four-pot engines, although the latter engine is offered only in the all-wheel-drive setup. The all-wheel-drive system is front-biased, and directs up to 50% of the power to the rear axle upon detection of wheel slippage. There is a centre differential-lock button to manually lock the power distribution between the front and rear axles at a constant 50:50 ratio, should the off-road going get tougher.

Propelling our tester was Hyundai’s four-pot 2.4-litre engine rated for 176 hp and 228 Nm of torque. Mated to a smooth-shifting 6-speed tiptronic transmission, our Tucson did the 0–100 kph gallop in 10.8 seconds, on a fairly hot afternoon in May. Although the motor is the same as the one found in the Sonata, the fuel efficiency numbers we achieved with the Tucson were not impressive. With the trip computer constantly displaying a staggering 12.5 l/100 km on a highway drive, it is even worse than the bulkier Hyundai Santa-Fe running on the same motor. And the relatively small 55-litre fuel tank does not help things either, with the maximum driveable range being not more than 370 km, before the fuel-low warning comes on.

While decent handling is usually not Hyundai’s cup of tea, the Tucson happened to be a surprise. Handling was above-average, with good grip levels and cornering limits, all pretty admirable for a compact crossover. There is moderate body-roll at most, and on crossing the limits, the Tucson safely understeers sans any drama. It even held up well in emergency lane changing manoeuvres, unlike its bigger brother, the Hyundai Santa Fe. The good news is that, the ride comfort has not been significantly compromised. Although it rides a tad firmly, it soaks up most road imperfections in a fairly gentle manner. There is mild feedback from the steering and other controls, and the brakes feel a tad bit mushy. While it cannot outdo a VW Tiguan in the corners, it can surely match up to the Japanese competition.

2012 Hyundai Tucson

Although not exactly an off-roader, we did take our Tucson for some sand excursions too, which included climbing a fairly steep desert dune, and some beach bashing, all without deflating the tyres. With a responsive all-wheel-drive system, a center diff-lock, good approach angle, and decent low-end kick, the Tucson did not disappoint. Lack of low-range gearing and a car-like ride-height means the Tucson’s off-roading abilities theoretically do not stretch beyond the beaches, and some mild-to-moderate desert or rocky terrains; and within those limits, the Tucson shines. If you fancy going any further though, you shouldn’t be looking at the Tucson in the first place.

The 2013 Hyundai Tucson competes in a crowded, or rather overcrowded segment, where the public is spoilt with a massive amount of choices. Boasting a starting price that sits lower than that of a basic Civic, the Tucson potentially murders atleast half of its competition downright. Great specs, remarkable interior quality, and good looks, only make it a tempting choice for small families who prefer qualities such as, a higher driving position, space and practicality, and affordability. That pretty much explains the popularity of the Hyundai Tucson in this region.

Photos by Vivek Menon.

We’d like to thank Jain Sathian and Dimple Jain, for providing their vehicle for this test drive.

26 comments to First drive: 2013 Hyundai Tucson 2.4 in the UAE

  • Mitch

    Another good, conclusive review from Vivek. Well done!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
  • nosdegorminds

    On a personal note, this is where Hyundai/Kia has a step forward from others. Give consumer a choice in a very competitive market considering the price options with the same car specifications. Just remembering, how Samsung is literally dominating Apple now in phones.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +1
  • ahmed s

    if you asked a guy with two sons , how many sons you have ? His reply would be tucson(Two son)

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
    • Mashfique Hussain Chowdhury

      I wonder how many got that joke. Even I called it Tuckson for years, hehe. I still do, even after knowing the correct way.

      VN:F [1.9.22_1171]
        +5
    • Nabeal

      actually I used to say tuson but then some Hyundai person told it tuckson so I thought that’s how it is, now I know tuson is correct.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        0
    • shafiq

      since when is C a vowel ? if its spelled tuc son, it will be called just that. anyways its a noun doesnt matter, what u call it.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        +1
  • Hammad Alam

    Finally……I was waiting for it

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +1
  • prado

    good review vivik spot on the issues particularly on the fuel economy bit

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +2
  • Nabeal

    Recently drove one. i don’t know what the problem was but even if i floor the paddle still it was accelerating like it fitted with 1.3 engine and even manual shift in auto transmission was not working. But then after restarting the car, everything started working fine.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +1
  • samer

    The part of fuel tank is the most important and I dont know why nobody is talking about it, Im considering the V6 new santa fe, and it has 65 liters tank only? seriously what they were thinking? do they thing customers are stupid and will be happy to fill it with 90 dhs …. aha, I filled an SUV with less than a camry !!!! so what is the benefit if it only can take me for 380-400 kms maximum? my cousin has V6 accord and it has 80 liters, he says on highway it takes him as long as 700 kms, of course they are from 2 different categories but for a 7 seater SUV with V6, the tank should be at least 75-80 liters, and for the Tucson, it also should be 60-65 liters at least, I dont want to waste 15 minutes of my life every other day at gas station

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +4
  • RP

    Whatever changes one makes to a mule it will never become a horse!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      -5
    • v6turbo

      Unfortunately / Fortunately whatever you say, the public is very happy with the mule and will buy it in large numbers.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        +13
    • prado

      the donkey at times is more useful than the horse….

      and more reliable.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        +16
    • Mitch

      It is cheaper. Thats makes the big difference.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        0
  • manish

    looking for a 7 seater – not for off roading – pls advice – unable to decide between Hyundai Santa fe & Nissan pathfinder

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
    • Alvin Emmanuel Thomas

      I’d vouch for the Santa-Fe. It has the looks, and you could get the full-spec Hyundai for the starting price of the 2WD Pathfinder. Both of them don’t do full on off-roading anyways. But the CVT is a love or hate thing. You should test-drive both.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        -2
  • RP

    For comfort as a people mover only, then it is the Honda Odyssey. The third row in both the Sante Fe and Pathfinder are uncomfortable.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +1
  • manish

    thanx , but budget doesnt permit

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
  • ahmed s

    kia sorento
    mitsubhishi grandis
    toyota innova
    chevrolet captiva
    suzuki xl7(not sure whether still available)

    second hand:
    prado
    pajero
    fortuner
    ford explorer
    trailblazer
    honda pilot
    mazda cx7
    previa
    odyssey
    pathfinder
    etc etc etc.

    all the best!!!!!!

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      +1
  • manish

    dear Vivek,
    It wud be a gr8 help if u can pls comment about CVT engine reliability in new pathfinder – as various reviews deliver a confused picture. Some even say the older problems with CVT havent been solved.

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
    • vivek

      You mean the CVT transmission?! Reliability of any new component cannot be predicted. But generally, CVT transmissions in the Nissans have come a pretty long way, and are fairly reliable to my knowledge. Personally, whatever complaints that I have heard of, crop up well beyond 150k – 200k kms, unless the car is badly abused and hardly maintained properly (like a cab Altima). Problem is, if there is a problem with a CVT tranny, it cannot be fixed, and the entire transmission unit will need to be replaced. For a routine personal use, it should do just fine. And you are covered with a warranty in the initial years anyway, so I believe it is a safe bet.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        +2
    • Rahul Jones

      CVT transmissions reliability has got better compared to the time it came. There were few cases of failure in the early years with Altimas and Muranos. But now it has got better.

      But right time maintenance is very crucial for this transmission. And taking it to the right people for this kind of service is very important too.

      My friend owns a 2006 Murano and the works CVT works fine with over 165,000KMs.

      VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
        +1
  • manish

    dear Mr.Vivek
    thanx a lot

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
  • Ciraj C

    Dear Vivek,

    I would like purchase new Tucson 2013 4X2 STD one.

    Please let me know about maintenance & service cost compared to Toyota Corolla or Camry Sedans…..

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
  • Ciraj C

    Sorry i mean Tucson 2015 4X2 STD

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0
  • mohamed

    Hi Mr. Ciraj,

    have u bought tucson already? whts ur openion abt the car?

    VA:F [1.9.22_1171]
      0

Leave a Reply

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>