2024 Audi Q7 55 S-Line
| The Good: – Still handsome inside and out – Practicality and comfort – Good power and driving dynamics |
The Bad: – Fiddly multimedia system – Average third-row space – Limited offroad ability |
| The Good: – Still handsome inside and out – Practicality and comfort – Good power and driving dynamics |
The Bad: – Fiddly multimedia system – Average third-row space – Limited offroad ability |
| The Good: – Looks more interesting than Wrangler – More civil onroad than Wrangler – Faster offroad than base Wrangler |
The Bad: – More power would’ve been fun – Still kind of rough onroad – Expensive compared to indirect rivals |
Bentley has made the decision to retire the legendary W12 engine, and the 2024 Bentley Flying Spur is the last of their cars to get it, as the 2025 model has already been revealed with a hybrid V8, just like every other Bentley in their latest range. While the new hybrid motors boast more power, anyone who has driven a 12-cylinder car (and most, unfortunately, have not had the pleasure) can attest to how scintillating the entire experience is.
The German luxury carmakers had a good thing going. They all had settled on a sensible naming system for their respective brands by the late 1990s, cleanly designating the size of the model as well as the engine. Cracks started appearing when they had to come up with names for their new-fangled turbo engines. And now with the advent of electric models, all logic has been thrown out the window. While BMW and Mercedes-Benz have especially struggled, at least we know that anything with “e-tron” in the name of an Audi means it’s electric. The “RS” and “GT” badges have been randomly thrown in for good measure,
| The Good: – Handsome styling – Cabin trim and space – Fair handling |
The Bad: – Could use more power – Rides a bit on firm side – Limited offroad prowess |
| The Good: – Handsome styling – Cabin space and features – Comfort and offroad ability |
The Bad: – Average acceleration – Crossovers handle better – Premium price with options |
| The Good: – Practical size and features – Seating space and cabin trim – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Below average boot space – Pricier than rivals – No sunroof option |
| The Good: – Immensely spacious – Cabin tech and comfort – Handles well for its size |
The Bad: – Immense outer size – Fuel economy tumbles when pushed – Few hard plastic interior bits |
| The Good: – Clean styling inside and out – Good cabin space – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Tight third row – Pricier than rivals – Not particularly quick |
| The Good: – Monster offroader – Cabin space and features – Drives pretty well on-road |
The Bad: – Pricey with options – Fills out parking spaces – Fuel economy |